<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: IFDB statistics, part 2: Development systems	</title>
	<atom:link href="/blog/2012/11/ifdb-statistics-part-2-development-systems/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>/blog/2012/11/ifdb-statistics-part-2-development-systems/</link>
	<description>Interactive Fiction by Juhana Leinonen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 16:34:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Eriorg		</title>
		<link>/blog/2012/11/ifdb-statistics-part-2-development-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-10753</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eriorg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2012 16:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=653#comment-10753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you don&#039;t know them already, you might find these two blog posts by Emily Short interesting:

http://emshort.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/scraping-ifdb
http://emshort.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/more-ifdb-data]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don't know them already, you might find these two blog posts by Emily Short interesting:</p>
<p><a href="http://emshort.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/scraping-ifdb" rel="nofollow ugc">http://emshort.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/scraping-ifdb</a><br />
<a href="http://emshort.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/more-ifdb-data" rel="nofollow ugc">http://emshort.wordpress.com/2011/01/03/more-ifdb-data</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dannii		</title>
		<link>/blog/2012/11/ifdb-statistics-part-2-development-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-10728</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dannii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 13:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=653#comment-10728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think these two graphs are very interesting too (they have the same data as some from above, but with different graph settings, can you pick which ones? :P)

http://nitku.net/if/ifdb-statistics/index.php?id=509a3c4718d47&#038;chart=Area&#038;stacked=1
And its simplified Inform vs everything version: http://nitku.net/if/ifdb-statistics/index.php?id=50a50f882e8fe&#038;chart=Area&#038;stacked=1

Those worried about Inform apocalypse should consider that 2012 has been a similar year to 1999-2000. 2001 was the peak year in total publications, as well for Inform. Yet just two years later the total publications was almost as high, but Inform&#039;s proportional was significantly smaller. Who knows what will happen next year!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think these two graphs are very interesting too (they have the same data as some from above, but with different graph settings, can you pick which ones? :P)</p>
<p><a href="http://nitku.net/if/ifdb-statistics/index.php?id=509a3c4718d47&#038;chart=Area&#038;stacked=1" rel="nofollow ugc">http://nitku.net/if/ifdb-statistics/index.php?id=509a3c4718d47&#038;chart=Area&#038;stacked=1</a><br />
And its simplified Inform vs everything version: <a href="http://nitku.net/if/ifdb-statistics/index.php?id=50a50f882e8fe&#038;chart=Area&#038;stacked=1" rel="nofollow ugc">http://nitku.net/if/ifdb-statistics/index.php?id=50a50f882e8fe&#038;chart=Area&#038;stacked=1</a></p>
<p>Those worried about Inform apocalypse should consider that 2012 has been a similar year to 1999-2000. 2001 was the peak year in total publications, as well for Inform. Yet just two years later the total publications was almost as high, but Inform's proportional was significantly smaller. Who knows what will happen next year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Juhana		</title>
		<link>/blog/2012/11/ifdb-statistics-part-2-development-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-10724</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juhana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 06:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=653#comment-10724</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dannii: Thanks, the link is now fixed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dannii: Thanks, the link is now fixed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Felix		</title>
		<link>/blog/2012/11/ifdb-statistics-part-2-development-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-10723</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Felix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 06:14:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=653#comment-10723</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I remember being shocked at the revelation that 22 out of 26 games in the IFComp 2010 were written in Inform 7. At the time, I expressed fear that IF is turning into a monoculture. Since then, of course, we&#039;ve seen the massive rebirth of CYOA, but there you have it.

That said, it&#039;s interesting to see that Inform 6&#039;s all-time popularity is still unequaled. Sure, it&#039;s been used as a compilation target, but I suspect that&#039;s not the main cause...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember being shocked at the revelation that 22 out of 26 games in the IFComp 2010 were written in Inform 7. At the time, I expressed fear that IF is turning into a monoculture. Since then, of course, we've seen the massive rebirth of CYOA, but there you have it.</p>
<p>That said, it's interesting to see that Inform 6's all-time popularity is still unequaled. Sure, it's been used as a compilation target, but I suspect that's not the main cause...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dannii		</title>
		<link>/blog/2012/11/ifdb-statistics-part-2-development-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-10722</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dannii]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 02:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=653#comment-10722</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The fourth pie chart links to a line chart, which doesn&#039;t work for the data.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fourth pie chart links to a line chart, which doesn't work for the data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: S. John Ross		</title>
		<link>/blog/2012/11/ifdb-statistics-part-2-development-systems/comment-page-1/#comment-10721</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[S. John Ross]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 01:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/blog/?p=653#comment-10721</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anecdotally, I made an early attempt to learn IF programming with both TADS2 and I6, giving both systems a shot, and failed equally and miserably at each.

Later, I tried again with I7, and I7 worked so well for me that my plans to give TADS3 a spin have fallen into my &quot;one of these days&quot; bins of vague intent.

So I am at least a single isolated case of I7 attracting &quot;people into IF who would otherwise not have done so,&quot; even to the point where I tried to get in prior to I7, and found myself unable to.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anecdotally, I made an early attempt to learn IF programming with both TADS2 and I6, giving both systems a shot, and failed equally and miserably at each.</p>
<p>Later, I tried again with I7, and I7 worked so well for me that my plans to give TADS3 a spin have fallen into my "one of these days" bins of vague intent.</p>
<p>So I am at least a single isolated case of I7 attracting "people into IF who would otherwise not have done so," even to the point where I tried to get in prior to I7, and found myself unable to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
